Parkinson, Tarpey & Lloyd

Call Today!

Call Today! 215.352.3432
  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Criminal Defense
  • DUI
  • Client Reviews
  • Blog
  • Case Evaluation
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu

Tragedies Lead to Tougher Straw Purchase of Firearms Laws in PA — Philadelphia Man Faces 31 to 63 Year in Prison for Str

Law Blog 2013 January Tragedies Lead to Tougher Straw Purchase of Firearms Laws in PA — Philadelphia Man Faces 31 to 63 Year in Prison for Str
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Tragedies Lead to Tougher Straw Purchase of Firearms Laws in PA — Philadelphia Man Faces 31 to 63 Year in Prison for Straw Purchases of Gun Used to Kill Officer Brad Fox

Posted By Michael Parkinson || 16-Jan-2013

The debate surrounding the Second Amendment’s “right to bear arms” rages on, and while the Federal Government may take steps in the coming months to curb the sale and availability of firearms, local authorities, especially in Philadelphia and the surrounding counties have already taken action to find and prosecute the illegal transfer of firearms from one person to another know as "straw purchases" by people referred to as "straw purchasers."

A straw purchase is a common term used to refer to the illegal transfer of a firearm from one individual to another. In a typical scenario, a straw purchase happens when a person legally buys a gun and then gives, or sells, that gun to another person without following rules concerning the transfer of the firearm. In many cases, the gun ends up in the hands of someone who is not permitted to possess a gun under Pennsylvania law. (For a list of criminal convictions that can prohibit someone from possessing a firearm, even for hunting purposes, read our blog about Section 6105 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code).

There are three different (and sometimes inconsistent) bodies of law that apply to the transfer or purchase of a firearm: Federal, State, and Local. Officer Fox was murdered by a gun that was involved in a straw purchase. The killer had made numerous straw purchases of guns prior to the murder of the officer. The other person involved in these straw purchases was arrested, charged, and that Philadelphia man was sentenced to 22 to 66 years in prison.

Tragic events like school shooting at Sandy Hook and Officer Fox's death have drawn attention to straw purchases. Five or ten years ago, prosecutions for this crime were rare, but that is no longer the case. In Philadelphia, the District Attorney's Office has created a specialized unit to handle and prosecute these types of crimes. The unit consists of veteran prosecutors and detectives who are well adept at finding person who have made straw purchases and prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law. (For information about the GunStat Initiative, read our blogs about that Program here and here).

Contact our Philadelphia criminal defense attorneys for more information.

Categories: Community News, Guns in Philly, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Violent Crimes, Weapon Charges

Share Post

Recent Posts

  • Can I Get Someone out of Jail in Philadelphia Even Though the Court Is Closed Because of the Corona Virus (COVID-19)?
  • How Can a Criminal Conviction Affect Your Life?
  • How Will A DUI Conviction Impact My Car Insurance
  • Stay Connected with Parkinson, Tarpey & Lloyd
  • Mandatory 5 Year Prison Term for Gun & Drug Offenses in Pennsylvania
  • Gun Licence Permit Revocation Hearing
  • Timothy Tarpey & James R. Lloyd, III Become Members of The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100!
  • How Can I Defend Against False Allegations of Domestic Violence or Abuse?
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Parkinson, Tarpey & Lloyd

Call Today (215) 352-3432

Parkinson, Tarpey & Lloyd - Philadelphia Criminal Defense Attorney
1315 Walnut Street, Ste 1605, Philadelphia, PA 19107 View Map
Main (215) 352-3432
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.